| ID | Category | Title | Creator | Status | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | membership | Allow Balance Council admins to temporarily remove voting rights from members deemed inactive and unparticipating, but requiring restoration of their rights once said member wishes to be active and participate again | Dr. Jaska | FAILED | 1:6(3 abstained, 8 didn't vote) |
-
| User | Decision | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Freddy | NO | Balance changes should not be rushed. The purpose of this vote seems to be to push something into the next release. |
| Antibody | NO | |
| Arch | ABSTAIN | |
| bones_was_here | NO | This vote is unenforceable/invalid because the people repeatedly identified as "inactive" are team members, and the balance council does not have the authority to remove a team member's voting rights. See: https://xonotic.org/balance_council |
| Cloudwalk | ABSTAIN | |
| divVerent | NONE | |
| Dr. Jaska | YES | It is currently impossible to achieve a supermajority thanks to one third being completely dead, this slows down even the completely unanimous votes and makes 30 days the mandatory wait time regardless that all members which are expected to participate already have done so. |
| Halogene | NO | I feel personally addressed o.O |
| illwieckz | NONE | |
| LegendGuard | NONE | |
| Morosophos | NONE | |
| MrBougo | NONE | |
| nitroxis | NONE | |
| Silent | NONE | |
| SPLAT | NONE | |
| Spike29 | NO | We all have our lives and occupations and aren't meant to be active all the time. Some people may also not vote for lack of interest in the proposed changes (in which case it's probably best to vote "abstain") but may still want to make their voices heard in other votes. Besides, there's no hurry, waiting one month for a vote to end is not the end of the world. |
| terencehill | NO | we should first define precise rules for considering a Balance Council member inactive |
| z411 | ABSTAIN |