| ID | Category | Title | Creator | Status | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 159 | legacy | Running polls should still be private to team members only - we don't publish them in the public RSS. | CuBe0wL | PASSED | 8:2(2 abstained, 5 didn't vote) |
-
| User | Decision | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| divVerent | YES | (at least vote counts should be hidden) |
| MrBougo | NO | Agree with zykure, whose comment addresses Samual's and, to a lesser degree, merlijn's |
| CuBe0wL | YES | For polls that we'd like to make public, imho we should make a public screening first. That's imho the proper way to influence team members, not by pestering them while a vote is running. |
| Debugger | YES | |
| IDWMaster | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| kuniu | ABSTAIN | |
| Mario | YES | |
| matthiaskrgr | YES | |
| merlijn | YES | making results public before the final vote may compromise voters, as they can be influenced to change their vote |
| Mirio | YES | The community should be able to wait 10 (or less) days ;) |
| Morphed | YES | |
| Samual | ABSTAIN | I can see arguments going both ways-- On the one hand, it would be good to show these polls so community knows what is going on right now-- but on the other, we can easily involve community on decisions we want them to give feedback on ANYWAY... and this would stop trolls from bothering us otherwise. |
| sev | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Soelen | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Sydes | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| theShadow | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| zykure | NO | I'd like the public to know what's being decided upon in the team, but without showing them any details until the poll finishes (e.g. no specific votes, no preliminary poll result). |