Team Votes(#195)

Back

ID	Category	Title	Creator	Status	Result
195	legacy	Technical implementation of a suggestion doesn't matter in polls UNLESS if it's explicitely stated otherwise	CuBe0wL	FAILED	3:5(1 abstained, 12 didn't vote)

2013-12-23T12:03:34Z - 2014-01-02T12:03:52Z

User	Decision	Comment
divVerent	NO	I disagree here - if a vote is about a technical implementation, this is also part of what is being voted on. We should rather avoid putting technical details in the vote unless we have to. We can still put technical detail ideas in the !vyes text.
MrBougo	NO	Agree with div. The polls steer development, they are not just a source of inspirational ideas voted on quality. Therefore, implementation details matter.
Archer	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
bitbomb	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
CuBe0wL	YES	This is to prevent a good idea voted no or vetoed only because of technical reasons, not because the idea itself is bad.
detrate	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
FruitieX	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
GATTS	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
IDWMaster	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
JH0nny	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Mario	NO
matthiaskrgr	ABSTAIN
Mirio	NO
Morphed	YES
s1lence	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Samual	YES	It can be difficult to define some times-- when in doubt, ask the author. If they insist on a particular implementation, then in that case it can be vetoed.
sev	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Soelen	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Sydes	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
theShadow	NONE	(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
zykure	NO	+1 div0