ID | Category | Title | Creator | Status | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
219 | legacy | banning a person from #xonotic (freenode) must run through xonvote (make a vote whether to ban this person) | matthiaskrgr | PASSED | 5:4(1 abstained, 11 didn't vote) |
-
User | Decision | Comment |
---|---|---|
Antibody | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
divVerent | NO | but yes if we get a fast way of doing this (e.g. ban first, call vote, if vote outcome tends towards no, already unban, and apply final judgement after end of vote) - or maybe 4 eyes system |
Halogene | YES | |
MrBougo | NO | Is there any reason to have this poll? I don't want to have to wait 10 days to ban trolls, you can still call xonvotes to ban/unban people if you want. Looks to me like an overkill solution to a non-problem. |
terencehill | ABSTAIN | |
Archer | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
bitbomb | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
detrate | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
GATTS | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
IDWMaster | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
JH0nny | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
Mario | YES | |
matthiaskrgr | YES | |
Mirio | YES | Spammer need to go immediately. As for divVerents suggestion, maybe "vban <text>" instead of vcall and it would be limited to like ~3 days (further vote I guess) |
Morphed | YES | make ban instant and make vote to unban that person, if nobody cares, ban will stay |
s1lence | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
Samual | NO | Not all bans, but only controversial bans |
sev | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
Soelen | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
Sydes | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
zykure | NO | In line with div0 here |