Team Votes(#223)

Back

ID	Category	Title	Creator	Status	Result
223	legacy	When challenging an irc @op action, or voting about removing @op power from someone, said @op may not veto. A single person who got affected by the action may not start the vote, or veto. Violating this rule decides the most negative outcome of the vote for the violator.	divVerent	PASSED	4:1(0 abstained, 0 didn't vote)

2014-02-09T19:13:54Z - 2014-02-19T19:14:02Z

User	Decision	Comment
divVerent	YES	it would be sufficient if we instead accepted challenging a veto as standard procedure in response to vetoes of a vote against yourself. That way, you essentially can't veto a poll against yourself, but CAN turn it into a core team vote immediately. If this idea here by me is accepted, I consider the poll moot and you can consider this vote a no.
CuBe0wL	YES	But I'm only fine with the first part, as both divVerent and Samual raises very good points (div0 about veto against yourself, Samual that core team challenges are there for a reason).
merlijn	YES
Mirio	YES
Samual	NO	This rule is a strange exception upon the voting system which has been followed exactly the opposite in the past (example, user removal from core team), and I don't think it is the correct way to handle things. Vetos exist for a reason, and if someone challenges the vote then so be it.