| ID | Category | Title | Creator | Status | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 232 | legacy | Never allow on default maps the placement of warpzones unless their presence is explicitly clarified (i.e. with a visual effect such as on stormkeep, or a type of picture frame outline)-- This also means updating glowplant so that the warpzone there has a visual effect. | Samual | PASSED | 7:2(2 abstained, 12 didn't vote) |
-
| User | Decision | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Antibody | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| divVerent | YES | assuming 233 passes. Otherwise WILL_VETO. |
| Halogene | NO | I actually think warpzones that are barely or even not at all noticeable are a very interesting feature of Xonotic and I don't see why we should prevent default maps to show off this. Glowplant warpzone is brilliant the way it is imho. |
| MrBougo | ABSTAIN | |
| terencehill | YES | but with exceptions for maps where it's obvious or unavoidable (not the common case) |
| Archer | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| bitbomb | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| CuBe0wL | YES | Ok, however there will be always need for special cases of non-visible seamless warpzones, so let's not remove the shaders supporting that (eg. limbo map) |
| detrate | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| GATTS | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| IDWMaster | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| JH0nny | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| kuniu | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Mario | YES | |
| matthiaskrgr | NO | wtf?! fix your code instead... aren't warpzones one of he things which make xonotic quite unique? I never had problems with the warpzones there. If people are too fucking dumb for warpzones they shall just play another map. |
| Mirio | ABSTAIN | |
| packer | YES | |
| s1lence | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Samual | YES | I think this is incredibly important for usability purposes, i've seen enough complaints about glowplant and its confusing warpzone alone.. Fixing this would provide consistency to users, and it would I think strengthen the fidelity of the game. |
| sev | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Soelen | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Sydes | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| zykure | YES | I'll trust Samual on this one... |