Remove Domination mode. New mode (conquest) is being worked on as a replacement, supports existing domination maps and is more enjoyable
Mario
PASSED
4:1(5 abstained, 20 didn't vote)
-
User
Decision
Comment
divVerent
ABSTAIN
If conquest is Domination + harder capturing + reverse scoring ("last team standing") - like in Battlefield - then yes, as long as it supports >2 teams and a forward scoring mode stays available (which could be called... Domination, hehe, but also a cvar below g_conquest_*). If it's anything else, then consider this a no.
Halogene
ABSTAIN
no idea about conquest mode, but don't care too much about domination either
MrBougo
ABSTAIN
dom was fun though
Nitroxis
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
terencehill
YES
Archer
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
bitbomb
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
CuBe0wL
NO
wtf is conquest?
detrate
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
FruitieX
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
GATTS
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
IDWMaster
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
JH0nny
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
kuniu
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Mario
YES
Domination is one of the biggest users of the legacy team numbers, this may be a good step towards removing those hacks
matthiaskrgr
YES
Melanosuchus
ABSTAIN
I've tried conquest some time ago, and it was a bit too spawnkiller friendly, if that can be fixed is ok for me
merlijn
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Mirio
ABSTAIN
Morphed
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
packer
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
s1lence
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Samual
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
sev
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Soelen
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Sydes
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
theShadow
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
TimePath
YES
If the domination gameplay can be emulated, we aren't losing anything