Get our netradiant changes merged back into GtkRadiant and (if needed) rename q3map2 and/or maintain it separately
Melanosuchus
PASSED
7:0(2 abstained, 27 didn't vote)
-
User
Decision
Comment
Freddy
YES
there are just too many *radiant forks
Antibody
ABSTAIN
Halogene
YES
if that is possible and we find someone to do it, of course
Nitroxis
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
terencehill
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
AllieWay
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Archer
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
bitbomb
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
BuddyFriendGuy
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
CuBe0wL
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Debugger
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
detrate
YES
I'm 100% in favor if technically possible
Diomedes
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
FruitieX
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
GATTS
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
IDWMaster
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
JH0nny
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Jubilant
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
kuniu
NONE
(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
Mario
YES
martin--t
YES
always in favor of fewer unnecessary forks even though coming from blender i think radiant is a dead end regarding advanced eediting like symmetry, triangles, etc.
matthiaskrgr
YES
Melanosuchus
YES
We currently do a really terrible job at maintaining it, and we are missing out on fixes and new features