Team Votes(#346)

Back
ID Category Title Creator Status Result
346legacyGet our netradiant changes merged back into GtkRadiant and (if needed) rename q3map2 and/or maintain it separatelyMelanosuchusPASSED7:0(2 abstained, 27 didn't vote)
-
User Decision Comment
FreddyYESthere are just too many *radiant forks
AntibodyABSTAIN
HalogeneYESif that is possible and we find someone to do it, of course
NitroxisNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
terencehillNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
AllieWayNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
ArcherNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
bitbombNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
BuddyFriendGuyNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
CuBe0wLNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
DebuggerNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
detrateYESI'm 100% in favor if technically possible
DiomedesNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
FruitieXNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
GATTSNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
IDWMasterNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
JH0nnyNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
JubilantNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
kuniuNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
MarioYES
martin--tYESalways in favor of fewer unnecessary forks even though coming from blender i think radiant is a dead end regarding advanced eediting like symmetry, triangles, etc.
matthiaskrgrYES
MelanosuchusYESWe currently do a really terrible job at maintaining it, and we are missing out on fixes and new features
merlijnNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
MirioABSTAIN
MorphedNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
nyovNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
packerNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
s1lenceNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
SamualNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
sevNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
SoelenNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
SydesNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
theShadowNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
TimePathNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)
unfaNONE(auto-abstain due to inactivity)