| ID | Category | Title | Creator | Status | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 362 | legacy | Migrate Xonotic to GPLv3+ (i.e. remove GPLv2 license file, and no longer require GPLv2 compatible contributions). Note that our binaries for Linux and Windows are already GPLv3+ due to libgmp. | divVerent | PASSED | 2:1(4 abstained, 29 didn't vote) |
-
| User | Decision | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Freddy | ABSTAIN | |
| Antibody | YES | I have no problem w/ GPLv3. We should do it if it is easy. |
| divVerent | ABSTAIN | I'll abstain given I don't care that much. Another option could be a per-file migration, but that'd be quite confusing for contributors who'd have to check license of every file they touch. The migration, if we want to do it, can be done anytime given GPLv2+ gives us the right to do that; of course we'd still document that source files before <revision of the change> are still GPLv2. |
| MrBougo | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Nitroxis | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| terencehill | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| AllieWay | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Archer | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| bitbomb | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| BuddyFriendGuy | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| CuBe0wL | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Debugger | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| detrate | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Diomedes | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| FruitieX | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| GATTS | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| IDWMaster | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| JH0nny | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Jubilant | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| kuniu | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Mario | NO | No advantages have come to light over this move, only potentially negative effects (someone pushing for AGPL might have an easier time without GPLv2) |
| martin--t | ABSTAIN | don't care either way, as long as we don't have to include headers or names of authors or years in every file, this stuff never gets updated anyway and it's what git is for |
| Melanosuchus | YES | GPLv3 has cleared some wording regarding compatibility with other licenses. And if we have to distribute it as GPLv3 anyway there's no reason to keep the sources on a different license than the binaries, which would only cause confusion. |
| merlijn | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Mirio | ABSTAIN | |
| Morphed | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| nyov | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| packer | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| s1lence | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Samual | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| sev | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Soelen | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Sydes | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| theShadow | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| unfa | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| zykure | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |