| ID | Category | Title | Creator | Status | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 406 | legacy | lifetime ban for Antares for his persistent spamming about political issues | divVerent | PASSED | 5:4(0 abstained, 6 didn't vote) |
-
| User | Decision | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Freddy | YES | He's constantly bringing up his political view even if severly off-topic and tries to provoke. His choice of words and links are toxic |
| Antibody | NO | He's a troll, and he deserved the most recent ban, but I don't think a lifetime one is warranted. |
| bones_was_here | YES | Any ban length is OK IMO, I don't see any positive contributions, only the use of sensitive topics to be nasty |
| Cloudwalk | YES | In my personal experience, anyone so boldly shoving these discussions down everyone's throat are trying to express a political opinion, characteristic of a personality that we simply don't want in the community. |
| divVerent | YES | He's been warned multiple times and continues posting those links and topics on IRC. At some point, enough is enough. Last instance was qnet/#xonotic @ 05 Mar 2021 01:13:52 PM PST |
| Halogene | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| morosophos | NO | we could keep political talks in separate channels and/or forum sections if we want to keep the main channels clean. Lifetime ban is too severe punishment for this IMO. |
| MrBougo | YES | Political talk is fine, but his contributions show a persistent pattern of bad faith and memery which makes it turn sour and, dare I say, toxic. Chan culture is not the model I want to set for our community. |
| Nitroxis | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Spike29 | NO | He's been trolling for too long and deserves a second (longer) ban, but a lifetime punishment seems too harsh. |
| BuddyFriendGuy | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| detrate | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| martin--t | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Mirio | NO | |
| packer | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |