| ID | Category | Title | Creator | Status | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 410 | legacy | [vyes=prefer, vabstain=ok, vno=bad] Make Quakenet the home of the Xonotic dev channels (primarily #xonotic and #xonotic.team, currently on Freenode)? | divVerent | FAILED | 2:3(3 abstained, 9 didn't vote) |
-
| User | Decision | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Freddy | ABSTAIN | |
| Antibody | YES | We're already there, so this simplifies things a bit. |
| bones_was_here | NO | irc has poor accessibility, is unreliable, it's bridges are even less reliable, and it can be taken down by Drama beyond the control of the xon team |
| Cloudwalk | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| divVerent | ABSTAIN | I do need a bridge or something to have good mobile notification support - well, a Discord bridge on qnet seems to exist at least, not sure if we'd be OK with having that bridge in the dev team channel (maybe too sensitive at times?) - additionally, Quakenet openly allows 3 to 5 connections per IP so multiple connections for me is an option. |
| Halogene | ABSTAIN | I know this one :o) but just knowing it doesn't justify voting for it imho, so... |
| morosophos | NO | quakenet has reputation of being a place of offtopic discussions and flamewars, it would be better to isolate dev channels from it. |
| MrBougo | NO | prefer not to move all eggs into the same basket if we aren't feeling that much of a need |
| Nitroxis | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Spike29 | YES | Most Xonotic channels are already on Quakenet, it looks like a sane choice |
| terencehill | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| BuddyFriendGuy | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| detrate | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Mario | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| martin--t | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| Mirio | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |
| packer | NONE | (auto-abstain due to inactivity) |