Team Votes(#440)

Back

ID	Category	Title	Creator	Status	Result
440	organization	Give Cloudwalk Maintainer privileges on Gitlab back. Privileges were previously removed without vote as a result of a... verbal kerfuffle. As such, a NO on this poll will retroactively legitimize the change.	divVerent	FAILED	2:6(1 abstained, 6 didn't vote)

2024-12-27T23:58:37Z - 2025-01-06T23:58:37Z

User	Decision	Comment
Freddy	NO	Access shouldn't have been removed the way it was done, but the behavior afterwards was problematic. I initially voted "abstain", but CW's behavior during this poll was so unprofessional that I don't feel comfortable with giving maintainer privileges to them.
Antibody	NO	Unbelievably toxic behavior.
bones_was_here	NO	Xonotic Team never voted to grant Maintainer access to begin with. Recently Cloudwalk continued to demonstrate a complete lack of respect for https://xonotic.org/rules/ (specifically the parts about invective targeting persons and harassment) and for the Xonotic project itself, after having willfully harmed it out of petty spite and having abused his access to censor those who criticised his actions. Team members, especially Maintainers, are public representatives of the Xonotic project and must conduct themselves accordingly.
Cloudwalk	YES	Of course I'm going to vote for myself when I have the right to
divVerent	YES
Dr. Jaska	NO	ditto bones, I am not comfortable giving Maintainer access to someone who removes it from others and bans them from a project without democracy or a valid objective non-personal reason and majorly stirring up drama in the process alongside repeated personal attacks. I would even encourage consideration towards a vote which removes Cloudwalk from the Extended Xonotic Team due to their unchanging repeated behaviour.
Halogene	ABSTAIN	I have not followed what is going on and do not really want to dig through it
illwieckz	NONE
LegendGuard	NONE
morosophos	NONE
MrBougo	NONE
Nitroxis	NONE
Spike29	NO	Maintainer access should not have been unilaterally revoked. However, nothing personal, but Cloudwalk's behaviour has proven incompatible with our rules on several occasions, and as recently as yesterday. This is too problematic to ignore IMHO, and I'm afraid this behavioural pattern happens again, that's why I reluctantly vote no.
terencehill	NO	It's pointless and undesirable giving him Maintainer status back if he ends up being kicked off the team shortly thereafter. I would have voted yes otherwise
z411	NONE