| ID | Category | Title | Creator | Status | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 440 | organization | Give Cloudwalk Maintainer privileges on Gitlab back. Privileges were previously removed without vote as a result of a... verbal kerfuffle. As such, a NO on this poll will retroactively legitimize the change. | divVerent | FAILED | 2:6(1 abstained, 6 didn't vote) |
-
| User | Decision | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Freddy | NO | Access shouldn't have been removed the way it was done, but the behavior afterwards was problematic. I initially voted "abstain", but CW's behavior during this poll was so unprofessional that I don't feel comfortable with giving maintainer privileges to them. |
| Antibody | NO | Unbelievably toxic behavior. |
| bones_was_here | NO | Xonotic Team never voted to grant Maintainer access to begin with. Recently Cloudwalk continued to demonstrate a complete lack of respect for https://xonotic.org/rules/ (specifically the parts about invective targeting persons and harassment) and for the Xonotic project itself, after having willfully harmed it out of petty spite and having abused his access to censor those who criticised his actions. Team members, especially Maintainers, are public representatives of the Xonotic project and must conduct themselves accordingly. |
| Cloudwalk | YES | Of course I'm going to vote for myself when I have the right to |
| divVerent | YES | |
| Dr. Jaska | NO | ditto bones, I am not comfortable giving Maintainer access to someone who removes it from others and bans them from a project without democracy or a valid objective non-personal reason and majorly stirring up drama in the process alongside repeated personal attacks. I would even encourage consideration towards a vote which removes Cloudwalk from the Extended Xonotic Team due to their unchanging repeated behaviour. |
| Halogene | ABSTAIN | I have not followed what is going on and do not really want to dig through it |
| illwieckz | NONE | |
| LegendGuard | NONE | |
| morosophos | NONE | |
| MrBougo | NONE | |
| Nitroxis | NONE | |
| Spike29 | NO | Maintainer access should not have been unilaterally revoked. However, nothing personal, but Cloudwalk's behaviour has proven incompatible with our rules on several occasions, and as recently as yesterday. This is too problematic to ignore IMHO, and I'm afraid this behavioural pattern happens again, that's why I reluctantly vote no. |
| terencehill | NO | It's pointless and undesirable giving him Maintainer status back if he ends up being kicked off the team shortly thereafter. I would have voted yes otherwise |
| z411 | NONE |